Showing posts with label Pharisees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pharisees. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 9, 2019

Spiritual Formation and Christ's Resurrection pt5


            From the New Testament (NT) texts, we learn that Jesus of Nazareth chose 12 men to follow Him (Matt. 10:2-4, Mark 3:16-19, Luke 6:14-16, and Acts 1:13 minus Judas Iscariot) as “apostles”.[1]  These men are then described as witnesses to God having raised Jesus from the dead (Acts. 3:15).  What do we know about them and what would they have meant by saying that God raised Jesus from the dead?

Second-temple Jews:

            The Second-temple period extends from the sixth-century BC to the first-century AD, when the second Jewish temple was built in Jerusalem after the return from the Babylonian captivity, until its destruction in AD 70.[2]  Therefore, we refer to Judaism during this time as Second-temple Judaism.  That is not to say that there was only one type of Judaism during this time.  During the NT period, there were two major sects: the Pharisees and the Sadducees, both of which are involved in NT events.[3]  There was also the Zealots and the Essenes, but neither play a significant role in the NT.[4]

            According to the Jewish historian Josephus, the Jews liked the Pharisees over the Sadducees, but then again Josephus was a Pharisee (Antiquities, Book 18, Ch 1. 16).  The main difference between the two related to our topic is that the Pharisees believed in a resurrection of the dead, whereas the Sadducees did not.  Therefore, it is difficult to determine with complete accuracy what the peasant Jew in Galilee would have believed about the resurrection.  However, one thing that is perfectly clear, there is no evidence from second-temple Judaism in the belief of a dying messiah, let alone a dying and rising again messiah.  So it must be asked, where would second-temple peasant Jews have come up with such an idea?

What do we know about the 12? pt.1

            Two were the sons of Zebedee, James and his brother John, the latter of which is identified as the disciple that Jesus loved (Jn. 13:23) and had been a disciple of John the Baptist (Jn. 1:35). Their mother was Salome, who may have been the sister of Mary, Jesus’ mother (cf. Mt. 27:56, Jn. 19:25).  They were fisherman from Galilee, and business partners with Simon Peter (Lk. 5:10).  Two final details are that they own multiple boats (Lk. 5:11) and employed servants (Mk. 1:20) and therefore, may not have been poor.  Simon Peter and his brother Andrew were the sons of Jonas (John) and were from Bethsaida.  Peter was married (Mk. 1:30) and lived in Capernaum.  Andrew had also been a disciple of John the Baptist (Jn. 1:40).  Philip was also from Bethsaida (Jn1:44) and traveled from Galilee to hear John the Baptist (Jn. 1:43), likely with Andrew.  Perhaps because of his Greek name, it was him that the Greeks came to hope to get to talk to Jesus during the Passover (Jn. 12:20-33); ergo, it’s reasonable to think that he was fluent in Greek.  Philip went and found Nathanael/Bartholomew (Jn. 1:45), who may have been a fisherman from Cana in Galilee (Jn. 21:2).[5]  He also had gone to Bethany where John the Baptist was preaching (Jn. 1:28) and it seems was well versed in the Old Testament (Jn. 1:46).

           Thomas who is also called Didymus (Jn. 11:16) and was best known for being a doubter in the resurrection (Jn. 20:25).  He was the one that told the others they should go with Jesus to Bethany for the raising of Lazarus, saying that if Jesus were to die there, they should die with Him (Jn. 11:16).  Also, on the eve of the Passover, he was the one who questioned Jesus about them knowing the way (Jn. 14:5).  Next, Matthew, who is identified as Levi (cf. Mt. 10:3, Mk. 2:14 and Lk. 5:27) and called the son of Alphaeus (Mk.2:14) which raises the question if he is the brother of James the son of Alphaeus, of which there is no clear text calling them brothers as there is with Peter and Andrew or with James and John.  Levi does not seem to have been a follower of John the Baptist and was working in Capernaum as a tax collector, when he was called by Jesus (Lk. 5:27).  He must have had some education and been acquainted with Greek because of this position.  James son of Alphaeus, is sometimes referred to as James the less, beyond this little is known.  Judas, the son or brother of James, not Iscariot (Jn. 14:22) and sometimes identified as Thaddeus.[6]  He does not play a significant role in the gospels and only speaks once (Jn. 14:22).  Simon the Canaanite (Mt. 10:4, Mk 3:18) or Zelotes/Zealot (Lk. 6:15), these designations should be understood that at some point, Simon was associated with the movement of Judas of Galilee who opposed increased taxation during the census of Quirinius.  Simon was most likely from Galilee.  Simon does not play a significant role in the Gospels and as noted above, it is possible that he is to be identified with Nathanael, not Bartholomew.

            Lastly, Judas Iscariot, who is identified as the son of Simon (Jn. 13:2).  It is possible that he is the only non-Galilean, Iscariot meaning, man of Kerioth, which was somewhere south of Judea.  John’s Gospel gives us the most details regarding Judas.  Sufficient for the purpose here is to identify him as one of the 12.  As to the spreading of the gospel after the resurrection, Judas plays no part seeing how he was already dead from suicide by hanging (Mt. 27:5) and that afterward, wither the rope or branch broke, he fell to the ground in a gruesome manor (Acts 1:18).

Next week, we’ll continue to explore how the message of Jesus went out into the Greco-Roman world and changed it forever.


Written by Pastor Ozzy

For more information, visit our website
Follow us on Facebook
Or on Twitter
https://twitter.com/ccvmontroseco




[1] Peter, Andrew, James, John, Philip, Bartholomew (Nathanael Jn), Thomas, Matthew, James son of Alphaeus, Judas (Thaddaeus Mt & Mk) the son or brother of James, Simon the zealot and Judas Iscariot.
[2] Despite the fact that there were two temples during this period, Ezra’s temple and Herod’s temple.
[3] Josephus mentions three groups, we know there were more, but they are not relevant to this discussion.
[4] Some people have speculated that John the Baptist and Jesus were associated with the Essenes; however, there are no explicated NT references and there is no data from the DSS to support this notion.
[5] The Nathanael-Bartholomew connection is not for certain, others have identified Nathanael as Simon the son of Cleopas.
[6] There are seven people mentioned in the New Testament with the name.  We only need to be concerned with three of them.  First (1) Judas Iscariot.  Second, the apostle identified as (2) Thaddaeus and called Judas of James in Luke 6:16 and Acts 1:13 and finally a (3) brother of Jesus mentioned in Mt. 13:55 and Mk. 6:3.  There is no clear reason from the New Testament to identify 2 and 3 as the same person.  3 is commonly believed to be the author of Jude in the New Testament, he is identified as the brother of James, the author of the book that bears his name.

Monday, February 11, 2019

Spiritual Formation and The Law (pt. 3 The Old Testament's view of The Law)


Feel free to click the follow button here on the right and get notified when ➜   each new blog is posted.  (this button many not appear on cellphones or tablets)



For indeed circumcision is of value if you practice the Law; but if you are a transgressor of the Law, your circumcision has become uncircumcision (Holy Bible: New American Standard Bible, Romans 2:25).

So you shall observe to do just as the Lord your God has commanded you; you shall not turn aside to the right or to the left (Ibid. Deuteronomy 5:32).

            It should come as no surprise just how complicated the relationship between the New Covenant and the Old Covenant is.  In fact, as was mentioned in the last blog, the early church had to have a Council and debate Old Testament commands in the light of New Covenant theology (Acts 15).  Since the majority of the Jerusalem Council leadership was most likely made up of 1st century Jews, it is likely that we get a historically accurate 1st century Jewish understanding of the Law.  Although circumcision can be understood as the crux of the issue, notice that the sect of Christian Pharisees argue that gentile converts need not only be circumcised, but also instructed to follow the Law of Moses (15:5).  Therefore, it seems these 1st century Jews did not think of the Law of Moses as something which one could segment and pick and choose from.

            This mindset is also seen in the Old Testament and specifically in the Law itself.[1]  A few examples will suffice, “… do not turn aside from any of the words which I command you today, to the right or to the left…” (Ibid Deuteronomy 28:14). The Law promised penalties against the Israelites and it must be noted what would bring about those penalties, “But if you do not obey Me and do not carry out all these commandments” (Ibid. Leviticus 26:14).  Hence, the Law does not allow for picking and choosing.

            There are examples in the Old Testament where people attempted to disregard some laws and follow others.  King Jeroboam, amongst other changes, installed priests who were not from the tribe of Levi (1 Kings 12:31).  The Law indicated that only Levites could be priests (Deuteronomy 18:1-8, Exodus 29:9).  Ezra records that after the deportation, he was upset at some of the exiles, because they had been taking wives from non-Israelite nations (10:10-43), which was against the Law (Exodus 34:15-16, Deuteronomy 7:3).  Then, it seems that the Old Testament did not have a segmented view of the Law, but that violating one part was breaking the whole.  It also seems that that perspective was handed down in second Temple Judaism, which is why the Pharisaic party in Acts 15 believed this.


So far, it does not seem that Paul or the Old Testament support a segmenting view of the Law, next week we’ll return to the New Testament as we continue to ask, “What is a Christian’s relationship to the Old Testament Law?” (Click Part 4)



Written by Pastor Ozzy

For more information, visit our website
Follow us on Facebook
Or on Twitter






Works Cited

1995. Holy Bible: New American Standard Bible. LaHabra: The Lockman Foundation.




[1] This work assumes Mosaic authorship and thus rejects the documentary hypothesis.

Monday, October 8, 2018

Spiritual Formation (Prayer Life Part 5 Unanswered)

Feel free to click the follow button here on the right and get notified when ➜   each new blog is posted.



[Jesus said] “Therefore I say to you, all things for which you pray and ask, believe that you have received them, and they will be granted you” (Holy Bible: New American Standard Bible, Mark 11:24)


          Some passages in the New Testament, like the one cited above, can make prayer sound like carte blanche; however, the context of this passage explains its meaning.  Jesus makes this statement on the Tuesday morning after the Triumphal Entry.  On Monday morning, Jesus and the disciples were walking from Bethany to Jerusalem and on the way, Jesus cursed a fig tree that He found to be without fruit.  When they arrived in Jerusalem, Jesus saw the corruption of the religious system and in reaction, He drove out the people selling animals inside the temple.  In His zeal, He shouted passages from the prophets, saying that the temple was meant to be a ministry to all the nations, but the ruling religious system had changed it into a den of robbers.  It is the next day, when Jesus and the disciples are making the journey again, that Peter notices the fig tree had withered.

           These events have led to this scene, and Jesus’s statement is made in that context.  The religious system, that had been instituted by God, had failed to reach out to the nations.  John the Baptist had cried out to Israel to make ready the path of the Lord, fill in the ravines and lower the hills and mountains (Luke 3:4 & 5).  The religious system had become a mountain in the path of the Lord.  Because of that, Jesus tells the disciples that by prayer, mountains can be moved.  The disciples, 12 men from the middle of nowhere, with no political connections and no money, cannot undo the religious system.  It’s possible that 11 of the men Jesus is talking to are under 20 years old [only Jesus and Peter paid the temple tax in Matthew 17:27] and the Pharisees/Sadducees have been ruling in second-temple Judaism since late Hasmonean period.  In other words, this mountain is well established, and the disciples are nobodies, with no power to move a mountain themselves.

           In that context, Jesus is telling them that prayer can move mountains standing in God’s way.  This mountain needed to be moved.  It was blocking the Abrahamic promise of blessing to all nations (Genesis 12:3c).  Therefore, prayers offered in accordance with God’s purposes can be prayed with confidence[1].  This understanding is in harmony with John’s explanation, “This is the confidence which we have before Him, that, if we ask anything according to His will, He hears us.  And if we know that He hears us in whatever we ask, we know that we have the requests which we have asked from Him” (Holy Bible: New American Standard Bible, 1 John 5:14-15).

Growth through unanswered prayers 



Written by Pastor Ozzy

For more information, visit our website
Follow us on Facebook
Or on Twitter


1995. Holy Bible: New American Standard Bible. LaHabra: The Lockman Foundation.




[1] Mark 11:25-26 goes on to discuss a person’s prayer and their relationship to forgiving others.